AI Agents Built for Real Business Workflows
Custom AI agents for business: agents that research, operate tools and complete multi-step work — with memory, guardrails and evaluation, designed by the engineer who builds agent infrastructure.
AI Agents Built for Real Business Workflows
Custom AI agents for business: agents that research, operate tools and complete multi-step work — with memory, guardrails and evaluation, designed by the engineer who builds agent infrastructure.
An AI agent is a model that can plan, call tools and act on the result — not just answer a question. That makes agents useful for work with several steps and no fixed path: researching a topic across sources, working through a queue of requests, or operating an internal system on someone's behalf.
It also makes them easy to get wrong. The model call is the simple part; what decides whether an agent is useful in production is everything around it — what it remembers, which tools it may use, how its output is checked, and what it does when it is unsure. That surrounding infrastructure is what I build.
Where agents fit
- Research agents that gather, compare and summarise information into a structured brief.
- Internal knowledge agents that answer from your own documents and systems, with sources.
- Operations agents that work through tickets, requests or data-cleanup queues.
- Customer-facing agents that go beyond a chatbot: they look things up and take actions, within limits you set.
Agents vs chatbots vs automation
A chatbot answers. An automation follows a fixed path. An agent decides the path at run time, using tools. If your workflow always runs the same steps, AI automation is simpler and cheaper. If it needs a conversation, start with a chatbot. Agents are for work where the next step depends on what the last one found.
What I build into every agent
- Memory — what the agent should retain between sessions, and how it recalls it.
- Tools — a small, explicit set of actions, each with permissions and logging.
- Guardrails — limits on what it may do, and human approval where it matters.
- Evaluation — test cases that show whether a change made it better or worse.
- Observability — every run traceable: inputs, tool calls, cost and outcome.
Proof
- CaBrain — the memory system I built for agents: hybrid retrieval and an entity graph, reached over MCP.
- Orchestra MCP — plugin-based tooling for agents, with 290+ MCP tools.
- Opportunity Radar — a research pipeline that turns search strategies into scored, traceable evidence.
- ID8 Media — an Arabic AI intelligence platform of analyst agents in Go, on Gemini and Cloud Run.
- One Studio — an agentic operating layer with agents, evals, guardrails, memory and observability.
For agents that must keep your data in-house, see Private AI.
FAQ
What is the difference between an AI agent and a chatbot?
A chatbot responds to messages. An agent can also plan steps, call tools such as your CRM or database, and act on the results. Many business needs are met by a chatbot; agents are worth it when the work itself has several steps.
Can an agent work with our internal systems?
Yes, through their APIs, with an explicit list of allowed actions. Each action is logged, and sensitive ones can require a person's approval.
How do you stop an agent from making things up?
By grounding it in retrieved sources, limiting what it can do, checking its output with evaluations, and routing uncertain cases to a person rather than guessing.
What is included6
- Agent design: goals, tools and limits
- Memory and retrieval (RAG)
- Tool integrations with permissions and logs
- Evaluations and guardrails
- Observability and cost tracking
- Multi-agent architecture where it helps